In addition to writing about the topics on my mind, I enjoy using this space to talk about the topics on other people’s minds. Pat Thomson had a recent post on methods assignments and methods chapters that was fascinating to me. She was writing about the possibility that a certain notion of doctoral training might have deleterious consequences for how doctoral writers conceive of their intellectual task: “I’m worried that in instituting doctoral ‘training’ courses, we might have extended the under and taught postgraduate assignment genre, and everything it means, into doctoral research.” The specifics of her concern are connected to the shape and conditions of the doctorate in the UK, but the question of how much disciplinary training ought to be given to doctoral students is of broader interest.
My own doctoral education was pretty much a matter of trial and error; the overwhelming message was ‘we trust you, you’ll figure it out’. We were, by many measures, neglected, although we preferred to think of it as European (sounds better). From the very outset, we were expected to come up with our own topics—and our own due dates, but that’s another story—and our own reading lists. Those who finished the program (and many did not) were generally ready to take responsibility for an autonomous research agenda. While that sounds positive, the fact remains that the time-to-degree was unmanageable and the attrition rates were unacceptable.
It is with this slightly Darwinian back story that I now teach academic writing to graduate students. My biggest initial adjustment in this position was grasping the degree of support and scaffolding that my current university provides to doctoral students. To be clear, I think the growth of a supportive infrastructure surrounding doctoral education is an excellent thing. And so I was intrigued by the suggestion that doctoral training could have the unintended consequence of diminishing the extent to which doctoral students are able to inhabit their new role as researchers. I realize that this is somewhat dicey territory. I have absolutely no desire to be the person blathering on about my uphill walk both ways! Nor do I think that suffering should be replicated out of habit or misplaced ideas about its value. But I also know some of the frustration I see in some doctoral students comes from a certain stasis in the role of student. The shift away from student toward researcher can be facilitated but cannot, by definition, be taught. Autonomy will come from experience, not instruction. As I have discussed before in this space, I believe that doctoral writers need to avail themselves of a range of resources in order to gain the confidence and competence to occupy their new role.
As always, I will end this links post with things that I have recently shared on Twitter; since my last links post was in mid-December, there’s lots of great stuff!
♦
Recent links from @explorstyle on Twitter
From @StanCarey, a strong endorsement of the singular ‘they’. Bonus: you won’t be forced to use ‘thou’ for the sake of consistency!
From @thesiswhisperer, having a key word to act as a theme or rubric for the year. My word: habit.
From @joshmkim, how inbox=zero has worked for him. A great way to make more rational decisions about what tasks to do when.
From @thesiswhisperer, a great @DocwritingSIG post on “working in the deep end of the methods pool”. Very helpful!
From @PhD2Published, a summary of the January 24th #acwri chat on the value of Twitter for academic writing.
From @phdcomics, a brutal comic on the perils of conference presentations. Don’t let any of this happen to you!
From @ntos, a great cartoon about blogging in academia.
My favourite non-academic blogger (from the Dinner: A Love Story blog) has great advice about starting and managing a blog.
From the Lingua Franca blog, William Germano gives you all the ‘catfish’ puns you could ask for.
From @scholarlykitchn, a useful discussion of the systems in place for pre- and post-publication peer review.
From @ThomsonPat, a post on blogging identity: crafting private ‘texts’ (for instance, teaching conversations) into public and enduring ones.
From @professorisin, tough, helpful advice on crafting a teaching philosophy that doesn’t rely on emotion, aspiration.
From @GradHacker, an argument for the cognitive benefits of using pen and paper.
From @utpress, a new grammar feature on their blog: When to use a semicolon and a colon?
From the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine blog, reflections on becoming a peer-reviewed blog.
@MacDictionary asks whether adverbs imply ill-chosen verbs: Could your writing stand to lose a few adverbs?
From @fishhookopeneye, an argument for vibrant presentations regardless of disciplinary dictates. Here’s my take on the same question.
From @PhD2Published, a short discussion of typical patterns in research article conclusions.
From @raulpacheco, a great Storify on how academics can benefit from Twitter.
From John Tierney in the New York Times, an account of ‘positive procrastination‘: can you trick yourself into getting the important stuff done?
From @thesiswhisperer, thoughts on concentration, energy, laziness, adrenaline, and completion in our academic work.
From @StanCarey, a discussion of prepositions at the end of sentences, with the best example ever.
From @GradHacker, thoughts about the fine line between pernicious and productive anxiety.
From @AltAcademix, suggestions on expanding career preparation during doctoral study.
People are always trying to get forestall usage that irks them. I love this project to revive neglected words instead.
From @scholarlykitchn, interesting comments on online comments and the lack thereof.
From Inside Higher Ed, Barbara Fister on the way excess negativity can preclude much-needed rational responses to real challenges.
From The Onion, 4 Copy Editors Killed In Ongoing AP Style, Chicago Manual Gang Violence.
The first #acwri chat of the year talked about resolutions and motivation.
From @MacDictionary, a useful discussion of nominalizations and communicative goals.
From The Monkey Cage blog, JSTOR Cracks the Door.
From @UVenus, lovely reflections on superstition amidst rationality in our scholarly routines.
From @StanCarey, the need to question but not demonize nominalizations.
From McSweeney’s, some irreverent writing advice.
From @qui_oui, a great take on the balancing act performed by contemporary graduate students.
From @poynter, an entertaining list of media mistakes, corrections, apologies, hoaxes, typos, &c from 2012.
From @PhD2Published, a Storify of #AcWriMo success stories.
From the Crooked Timber blog, an excellent defense of Erik Loomis.
From the When in Academia tumblr, an accurate depiction of me and today’s blog post.
From @ThomsonPat, how to prepare to write a conclusion by returning to the commitments made at the outset.
This piece in The New Yorker made me think how a thesis can alternate between being a focal point and being a distraction.
From @PhD2Published, reflections and a Storify on conference presentations on social media and academics.
From Inside Higher Ed, a great round-up of a year’s worth of MOOC-related commentary.
Writing at @DocwritingSIG, @thesiswhisperer has some recommendations (including some kind words about @explorstyle).
From @ThomsonPat, a precise and perceptive account of what can go wrong in a thesis conclusion.
Explorations of Style 